BREAKING: Defense Department reinstates gender-affirming care for trans troops

May Be Interested In:Mascherano: Everything not ‘fine’ at Inter Miami


The Department of Defense will resume providing gender-affirming care for transgender service members, according to a leaked memo obtained by Politico.

It’s “an embarrassing setback to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s efforts to restrict their participation,” the outlet reports.

The Defense Department is complying with a court order that found the restrictions on trans service members unconstitutional. Federal judges have blocked the ban in two separate lawsuits, and one appeals court has denied the department’s request to lift the block while legal challenges proceed. Donald Trump’s administration has now appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

“Service members and all other covered beneficiaries 19 years of age or older may receive appropriate care for their diagnosis of [gender dysphoria], including mental health care and counseling and newly initiated or ongoing cross-sex hormone therapy,” Dr. Stephen Ferrara, the acting assistant secretary of Defense for health affairs, said in the memo obtained by Politico. It was dated Monday. This returns the department to its trans-inclusive policy implemented during Joe Biden’s presidency.

The Trump administration policy stems from an executive order he signed in February to reinstate the trans ban from his first presidency. Lawyers for the administration have argued it’s simply a ban on service members experiencing gender dysphoria, but courts have held that it’s a ban on all trans troops and therefore discriminatory and unconstitutional.

The government’s Supreme Court request follows the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s upholding of an injunction in one of the cases, Shilling v. United States. The appeals court upheld U.S. District Judge Benjamin Settle’s ruling that blocked the enforcement of Trump’s executive order, . He ruled that the policy likely violates the Fifth Amendment’s equal protection guarantee and called it “dramatic and facially unfair,” citing a lack of evidence that transgender troops harm military readiness.

In the other case, Talbott v. United States, D.C. District Judge Ana Reyes described the ban as “soaked in animus and dripping with pretext.” The administration appealed Reyes’s injunction against the ban in the federal appeals court for the D.C. Circuit, but in a hearing Tuesday, Department of Justice lawyers struggled to defend the ban.

Story developing….

share Share facebook pinterest whatsapp x print

Similar Content

Disarray at Pentagon puts spotlight on civilian leadership’s crucial role
Disarray at Pentagon puts spotlight on civilian leadership’s crucial role
SpaceX Test Flight Explodes, Again
SpaceX Test Flight Explodes, Again
Ancient wasp may have used its rear end to trap flies
Ancient wasp may have used its rear end to trap flies
'Who Are You Putting the Apple Watch On? The Toddler?': What We Heard This Week
'Who Are You Putting the Apple Watch On? The Toddler?': What We Heard This Week
Plane crash off Caribbean island kills at least 12 people, including popular Honduran musician Aurelio Martinez
Plane crash off Caribbean island kills at least 12 people, including popular Honduran musician Aurelio Martinez
Vintage photos show what it was like to eat at McDonald's in the 1970s
Vintage photos show what it was like to eat at McDonald’s in the 1970s

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Breaking Today: News That Matters, Delivered Fast | © 2025 | Daily News